The Dust and the Breath: A Theological Critique of Theistic Evolution 尘土与气息：神导进化论的神学反思
Examining the theological tensions between the evolutionary process and the biblical account of special creation, Adam's historicity, and the origin of death. 探讨进化过程与圣经关于特殊创造、亚当的历史性以及死亡起源之记录之间的神学张力。
Listen to English audio
聆听中文语音
Introduction: The Middle Ground?
引言：中间地带？
In an age dominated by naturalistic paradigms, many Christians have sought a synthesis between the biblical account of creation and the modern theory of evolution. This position, known as Theistic Evolution (or Evolutionary Creationism), posits that God utilized the natural process of evolution to bring about biological life and, ultimately, humanity. While motivated by a desire to resolve the tension between “faith and science,” this synthesis introduces profound theological challenges that touch the very heart of the Gospel.
在一个由自然主义范式主导的时代，许多基督徒试图在圣经的创造记录与现代进化论之间寻求一种合成。这种被称为神导进化论（或进化创造论）的立场认为，上帝利用进化的自然过程产生了生物生命，并最终产生了人类。虽然这种合成的动机是希望解决“信仰与科学”之间的张力，但它也引入了深刻的神学挑战，触及了福音的核心。
1. The Historicity of Adam and Federal Headship
1. 亚当的历史性与代表元首地位
The most critical theological casualty of Theistic Evolution is often the historical Adam. If humanity emerged from a large population of hominids through a slow, natural process, the biblical account of a single, specially created pair (Adam and Eve) becomes a myth or a metaphor.
神导进化论最关键的神学牺牲品往往是历史性的亚当。如果人类是通过缓慢的自然过程从一大群原始人中产生的，那么圣经中关于一对唯一的、被特殊创造的夫妇（亚当和夏娃）的记载就变成了一个神话或隐喻。
However, the New Testament’s logic of salvation is inextricably linked to the historicity of Adam. The Apostle Paul does not treat Adam as a literary symbol, but as a historical figure whose singular act of rebellion affected all of humanity. This is the doctrine of Federal Headship: just as we are condemned in the first Adam, we are justified in the Last Adam, Jesus Christ.
然而，新约圣经的救赎逻辑与亚当的历史性有着密不可分的联系。使徒保罗并没有将亚当视为一个文学象征，而是将其视为一个历史人物，其唯一的叛逆行为影响了全人类。这就是代表元首地位（Federal Headship）的教义：正如我们在第一个亚当里被定罪，我们在末后的亚当——耶稣基督里被称义。
"For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive."
— 1 Corinthians 15:22
“在亚当里众人都死了；照样，在基督里众人也都要复活。”
—— 哥林多前书 15:22
If there was no historical Adam who fell into sin, the theological foundation for our need for a historical Savior who satisfies divine justice is severely undermined. If “Adam” is merely a symbol for humanity’s general sinful condition, then the Fall is a natural byproduct of evolution rather than a moral catastrophe.
如果没有一个堕入罪中的历史性亚当，那么我们需要一位满足神圣公义的历史性救主的神学基础就会受到严重的削弱。如果“亚当”仅仅是人类普遍罪恶状态的象征，那么堕落就是进化的自然副产品，而不是一场道德灾难。
2. The Problem of Death: Creation Tool or Wages of Sin?
2. 死亡的问题：创造工具还是罪的工价？
Theistic Evolution requires millions of years of death, struggle, and extinction to occur long before the first humans appeared. In this paradigm, death is a natural and necessary mechanism of biological “progress.”
神导进化论要求在第一批人类出现之前，已经存在了数百万年的死亡、挣扎和灭绝。在这种范式中，死亡是生物“进步”的一种自然且必要的机制。
Contrast this with the biblical teaching that death is an “enemy” (1 Cor 15:26) and the specific “wages of sin” (Rom 6:23). If death existed as part of God’s “very good” creation process, then God Himself is the author of death, rather than death being a tragic intrusion caused by human rebellion.
这与圣经的教导形成了鲜明对比，圣经认为死亡是“仇敌”（林前 15:26），是特定的“罪的工价”（罗 6:23）。如果死亡是上帝“甚好”的创造过程的一部分，那么上帝本身就是死亡的作者，而不是死亡是由人类叛逆引起的一种悲剧性入侵。
"To accept theistic evolution is to accept that God used death to create life. But the Bible presents death as the antithesis of God's creative work—a curse that entered the world only after the Fall."
— Wayne Grudem, *Theistic Evolution: A Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Critique*
“接受神导进化论就是接受上帝利用死亡来创造生命。但圣经将死亡呈现为上帝创造工作的对立面——一种只有在堕落后才进入世界的咒诅。”
—— 韦恩·古德恩，《神导进化论：科学、哲学和神学的批判》
3. Special Creation vs. Naturalistic Continuity
3. 特殊创造与自然主义的连续性
Theistic Evolution tends to emphasize continuity—that humans are the end product of a seamless natural chain. Genesis, however, emphasizes discontinuity and special intervention. Man was not merely “born” from a line of primates; he was specially formed from the dust and received the “breath of life” directly from God.
神导进化论倾向于强调连续性——即人类是一个无缝自然链条的终端产物。然而，《创世记》强调的是不连续性和特殊的干预。人不仅仅是产生于灵长类动物的谱系；他是从尘土中被特殊塑造的，并直接从上帝那里接受了“生命的气息”。
"Then the LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being."
— Genesis 2:7
“耶和华神用地上的尘土造人，将生气吹在他鼻孔里，他就成了有灵的活人，名叫亚当。”
—— 创世记 2:7
This special creation is the basis for the Imago Dei (Image of God). While TE proponents argue that God could have “endowed” a primate with a soul, the biblical narrative depicts a far more intimate and direct creative act. The dignity of man is rooted in this unique origin, distinct from the animal kingdom.
这种特殊创造是“上帝形象”（Imago Dei）的基础。虽然神导进化论的支持者认为上帝可以给灵长类动物“赋予”一个灵魂，但圣经的叙事描绘了一个更为亲密和直接的创造行为。人的尊严根植于这种独特的起源，有别于动物王国。
4. The Authority of the “Two Books”
4. “两本书”的权威
Theistic Evolutionists often rely on the “Two Books” theory: God reveals Himself through the Book of Nature (General Revelation) and the Book of Scripture (Special Revelation). The problem arises when the current scientific consensus (Nature) is used as the absolute lens through which the plain meaning of Scripture must be reinterpreted.
神导进化论者经常依赖“两本书”理论：上帝通过自然之书（普遍启示）和圣经之书（特殊启示）启示祂自己。当当前的科学共识（自然）被用作重新解释圣经原意的绝对透镜时，问题就产生了。
In a Reformed world-view, while we respect science, we maintain that Scripture is the only infallible rule of faith and practice. When science and a plain reading of Scripture seem to conflict, we must be careful not to sacrifice core doctrines (like the Fall and the historical Adam) on the altar of a shifting scientific consensus.
在改革宗的世界观中，虽然我们尊重科学，但我们坚持圣经是信仰和生活的唯一无误准则。当科学与对圣经的直白阅读似乎发生冲突时，我们必须小心，不要在不断变化的科学共识的祭坛上牺牲核心教义（如堕落和历史性的亚当）。
Conclusion: Returning to the Breath
结语：回归那生命的气息
Theistic Evolution is an attempt to make the Bible “respectable” to a secular age. Yet, in doing so, it risks hollowing out the very structures that make the Gospel coherent. If we lose the historical Adam, we lose the historical Fall. If we lose the historical Fall, the historical Cross becomes an answer to a question that was never asked.
神导进化论是试图让圣经在一个世俗时代显得“体面”的一种尝试。然而，这样做可能会掏空使福音具有连贯性的结构。如果我们失去了历史性的亚当，我们就失去了历史性的堕落。如果我们失去了历史性的堕落，历史性的十字架就变成了一个从未被问过的问题的答案。
We must stand firmly on the testimony of the Word: that man was a special creation of God, fallen by a historical act of rebellion, and redeemable only through the blood of the Second Adam.
我们必须坚定地站在话语的见证之上：人是上帝特殊的创造，因历史性的叛逆行为而堕落，并且唯有通过第二个亚当的宝血才能得到救赎。
Bibliography
参考文献
- The Holy Bible, New American Standard Bible (NASB) / Chinese Union Version (CUV).
- 圣经，新美国标准圣经 (NASB) / 简体圣经和合本 (CUV)。
- Grudem, Wayne, J.P. Moreland, et al. Theistic Evolution: A Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Critique. Crossway, 2017.
- 古德恩, 韦恩等. 《神导进化论：科学、哲学和神学的批判》。
- Collins, C. John. Did Adam and Eve Really Exist? Who They Were and Why You Should Care. Crossway, 2011.
- 柯林斯, C. 约翰. 《亚当和夏娃真的存在吗？》。
- Westminster Confession of Faith, Chapter IV: Of Creation.
- 威斯敏斯特信条，第四章：论创造。